Continuous re-evaluation
Why buying is never a one-time decision, and how every position competes against every new opportunity.
Buying is not a one-time decision. Every market update triggers a complete re-evaluation of every open position. Holding requires continuous justification — a position stays open only while the expected reward remains superior to the expected risk.
The possible actions
| Action | When |
|---|---|
| Buy | Reward clearly exceeds risk and there is room to add. |
| Hold | The thesis still justifies the capital committed. |
| Reduce | Conviction has weakened but not collapsed. |
| Exit | The reason to own it no longer holds. |
| Ignore | The opportunity is not worth the lab’s attention or risk. |
Every position competes
Each open position competes against every new opportunity for the same capital. No trade is sacred. Capital flows to wherever the expected reward/risk is currently best — which is exactly why the lab favors short-lived, speculative opportunities over long-term holding by default.
Early-token positions move faster
Open early-token positions reevaluate far more often than mature ones, with a richer action set: HOLD · ADD · REDUCE · TAKE_PROFIT · EXIT · EMERGENCY_EXIT · HUMAN_REVIEW. Adding is treated as a new decision — never add merely because the price dropped.
| Reevaluation trigger | |
|---|---|
| Scheduled interval | Adaptive cadence — seconds early, then tapering |
| Price / liquidity threshold crossed | Sharp move or liquidity change |
| Creator-wallet movement | Creator selling or transferring |
| Whale distribution | Large holders exiting |
| Security-state change | New contract or honeypot signal |
| Failed sellability check | Exit may no longer be possible |
| Social-momentum reversal | Narrative fading |
| Exchange / chain incident | Venue degradation |
| Maximum holding time | Time-stop reached |